Hoi,
Given my background with OmegaWiki, I do not actively look into the Lexeme
part of Wikidata. When I do, I notice things that are really cool and yes,
Nobel prijswinnaar is a fine example of a lexeme. I am happy to notice and
applaud tools like Ordia, it is this kind of involvement we largely missed
at OmegaWiki.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 21:03, Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gerard,
>
> The entity would probably be.... a Lexeme :-)
> (yeah, I feel your pain also about merging and the loss of valuable data
> at times)
>
> Thad
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:14 PM Gerard Meijssen <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> What makes "Nobel prize winner" so special that we need an entity for
>> that. We have thousands and thousands of awards, the recipients of these
>> awards deserve in equal measure to be recognised. There are many other
>> awards like the UN Environment Programme awards that are not even in
>> Wikidata.
>>
>> Yes, we could do with more structure, we even need it. The biggest
>> problem we face is the lack of a conversation about quality. It allows
>> !@#$% to delete data from Wikidata because of what THEIR Wikipedia has
>> determined to be the gospel truth. It is why some !@#$ delete content
>> because their fetish with references. I am quite happy to add references by
>> the way, it just does not make sense to approach this on an item by item
>> basis.
>>
>> I also find that I am spending more time on merging and massaging data.
>> The most important part is that even though a merged item has a better
>> quality, either perspective on an item was of value.
>> Thanks,
>>        GerardM
>>
>> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 17:29, Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Another thing I see lacking here is the Common Concept itself is NOT in
>>> Wikidata currently.
>>>
>>> There is no entity that matches "nobel prize winner" currently.
>>> Perhaps one should be created?
>>>
>>> Anyways, I have started to help with a simple ShEx for validation that
>>> can be edited by all to help with Aidan's problem.
>>> (feel free to get in there, learn, and improve it, and check the
>>> entities from your query or queries you have, and add more rules or change
>>> them)
>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/EntitySchema:E126
>>>
>>> Thad
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to