Hello all,
I would like to know what you think of the proposal I made at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Future-proof_WDQS Like I said previously on wikidata mailing list, I can address the following problems related to WDQS: > In an ideal world, WDQS should: > > * scale in terms of data size > * scale in terms of number of edits > * have low update latency > * expose a SPARQL endpoint for queries > * allow anyone to run any queries on the public WDQS endpoint > * provide great query performance > * provide a high level of availability > > ref: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata/2019-June/013124.html The other proposal I made is about replacing both wikibase and blazegraph: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Iamamz3/Prototype_A_Scalable_WikiData What do you think? -- Amirouche ~ https://hyper.dev _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
