That would totally make sense! The analysis of the previous survey is here: http://openrefine.org/blog/2018/07/16/2018-survey-results.html We could probably do a better job at highlighting the corresponding issues with a dedicated tag.
Antonin On 10/02/2020 19:56, Samuel Klein wrote: > Sweet! Thanks for the reminder Antonin. > Will there also be a longlist of requests that results, that can't be > prioritized but are unlikely to be a focus by the core team? > > 🌍🌏🌎🌑 > > On Mon., Feb. 10, 2020, 2:16 p.m. Antonin Delpeuch (lists), > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just a reminder that OpenRefine needs your feedback to decide how it > should evolve in the coming years. We have a very short survey that you > can take to let us know what you think: > > > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd-Z00h433Y0pIutYyeW98C0Yss6p7RFisVIkkM8uxUtEpmRw/viewform > > In the previous survey, run in 2018, the problem that people brought up > most often was the poor performance on large datasets. So that is what > we are working on improving this year. Your responses to this survey > will shape the future of the tool! > > Thanks, > Antonin > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
