Hey Thad, if 'https://schema.org/gamePlatform' is a subproperty of P400 i would definitely say that processerRequirements can be a subproperty too!
-- Hay On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 2:42 AM Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Hay, > > It does seem that P400 (platform) is currently being generically used beyond > traditional platforms to say "some kind of hardware or system". > > If that is OK and indeed P400 has become elevated and less restrictive, then > I'll gladly use that. It's talk history during proposal seems to lead in many > side discussions but without general consensus of less or more restrictive > use...but now it's usage over the last 2 years seems much less restrictive. > > Would you agree that https://schema.org/processorRequirements could be > considered a subproperty of P400 (platform) ? > > Thad > https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:40 PM Hay (Husky) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hey Thad, >> interesting question. Maybe P400 (platform) might work? This is mostly >> used for things like 'Playstation 4' or 'iOS', but i think processor >> architecture could be valid there as well. >> >> Kind regards, >> -- Hay >> >> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:11 AM Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > With application Q166142 >> > >> > I ran into a mapping problem again with Schema.org where we have a nice >> > Property already called https://schema.org/processorRequirements that >> > allows listing the ISA (instruction set architecture) that some >> > applications are designed for and require in order to run. (This happened >> > a lot historically when the world wasn't limited to a handful of ISA's >> > beyond Intel-based and ARM-based :-) ) >> > >> > Anyways... >> > >> > As you can see on application Q166142 where I tried to overload through >> > properties for this type P1963 the use of the existing instruction set >> > P1068 which doesn't quite work, since an application is not a class of >> > electronic circuit or instruction set architecture. >> > >> > I could not find an appropriate Property already existing in a predicate >> > form. >> > Such as "requires ISA" or "requires instruction set" or even better and >> > more generally "depends on hardware" since we seem to already have a >> > depends on software Property and this could be the reverse to state that >> > some Thing has a hardware dependency or requires some kind of hardware ? >> > >> > I'd love some help in searching if something like this already exists, or >> > if that kind of Property was proposed before. (I sincerely tried and dug >> > around for over 2 hours) >> > >> > I could thus properly map and connect a few more dots to Schema.org's >> > property and other Linked Open Vocabularies. >> > >> > Thad >> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikidata mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
