Dear Dr. Wayne and other friends,

It is really an innovative suggestion and I am in favour of the title “Open
Computer Navigators Course" (OCNC)” and proposed linkage to curriculum. It
gives us more clarity of aim and seriousness of purpose.
Alison is doing a wonderful job in anchoring the discussion; I am able to
spend only a little time these days as I am fully engaged with some critical
assignments for April in my department.

-- 
Warm regards

Anil
http://wikieducator.org/User:Anil_Prasad
http://wikieducator.org/India
http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework
http://wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework/Professional_Education/Management/MHRM
http://www.wikieducator.org/Edupatron

Skype: apletters


On 4/10/09, Wayne Mackintosh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alison,
>
> Just a quick note --- Am a little snowed under at the moment with a bunch
> of activities, and have not been able to give this new community initiative
> the attention it deserves :-(.  A few reflections for consideration:
>
>
>    - I'm very supportive and excited to see new life and energy emerging
>    from our community to take CCNC to new levels. As a free and open source
>    software user -- my passion is to see the development of high-quality
>    teaching materials supporting basic ICT skills development using free
>    software.
>    - I like the idea of a dedicated list for the development --- with
>    updates posted to the main WE list.
>    - The need for these resources is far wider than the Commonwealth --
>    therefore I'm wondering whether a change in name is appropriate. What about
>    something like the "Open Computer Navigators Course" (OCNC). Fortunately we
>    use a license which permits derivative works including name changes :-).
>    Also, speaking from experience with the CCNC -- the notion of "certificate"
>    is confusing because the course materials do not provide certification as
>    such -- and should be available for use in multiple contexts. Changing the
>    name will also help getting away from the confusing subpages like Version 
> 2,
>    Version 3 etc.
>    - A key question for our group to consider will be whether the course
>    materials should meet the requirements of the ECDL/ICDL curriculum.
>    Personally, I think that there are significant advantages to doing this
>    because then we create optional paths for formal certification. That said 
> --
>    there may be differences in opinion here.
>
> In short -- I propose a name change which will be more representative of
> what these course materials are aiming to achieve and consideration about
> mapping to existing curricula and national qualifications frameworks.
>
> Looking forward to seeing our finished product --- a community driven
> initiative :-).
>
> Cheers
> Wayne
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 20:45 -0400, Alison Snieckus wrote:
>
> A few of us have been discussing how to proceed with updating the module
> content in the Commonwealth Computer Navigator's Certificate (CCNC).
>
> The consensus is to move the current pages to a new node:
> http://www.wikieducator.org/CCNC/Version2 . We recognize that following
> the move we'll need to fix absolute links and navigation.
>
> We plan to begin the new work under the following structure, copying
> material as appropriate from version 2:
> http://www.wikieducator.org/CCNC/Version3
>
> Given this project has a long standing history on WikiEducator, I thought
> I'd post our plans to this larger group for comment.
>
> Please respond with your thoughts and suggestions.
>
> Thank you,
> Alison
> http://www.wikieducator.org/User:ASnieckus
>
>
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to