Hi Valerie

Great post!  I agree -- we're not doing enough to welcome and support the
visitor "experience".

Looking at our site statistics, 84% of our traffic is sourced from search
engines finding our pages.

The visitor percentage may be a little overstated given that Mediawiki's
standard search engine is not the best in the world and many educators
search WikiEducator using Google by including "Wikieducator" in the google
search query.  From our statistics, this practice would account for about 2%
of our traffic sourced from search engines -- consequently, we have a high
percentage of "visitors" coming to WikiEducator through search engines.

On average -- users coming to WikiEducator via search engines visit
approximately 2.5 pages per visit (compared with an average of 18 pages per
visit for users including "WikiEducator" in the search query.)

Valerie -- in answer to your questions:

Are WE doing enough for "visitors"?  --  No, I don't think we're doing
enough :-(.

Can WE do better? -- Yes, WE can always do better :-)

Earlier this year -- I posted a few open questions to our list thinking
about whether we need to do any work on redesigning our landing page to
improve the visitor experience - see:  http://tinyurl.com/ya2y4p9

Perhaps we need to revisit these ideas and think about establishing a
workgroup to improve our visitor experience and to make recommendations for
improving our landing pages and support for visitors to WE?

Thoughts?

Wayne




2009/11/10 valerie <[email protected]>

>
> Thinking about "visitors" and "residents" - most of use are
> "residents" as well put our names on stuff. Our contributions are
> tracked in the wiki in history and discussions,  and in the group
> posts. WE are all busily creating open content, sometimes for our own
> needs, somethings as our contribution to making the world a better
> place through education. Stephen Downes recently linked to an article
> about funding content creators who are doing a great job of generating
> content. But he thought perhaps the funding should go to the folks who
> need to use the content. This got me wondering...
>
> What about the "visitors" and the WE visitor experience? Is anyone
> using any of the WE content besides the creators and their explicit
> intended learners? Do educators or learners just come along and
> satisfy their needs for learning resources by poking around in
> WikiEducator? Do we know who they are? Do we know how they found
> WikiEducator? Do we know how they found the content they needed?
>
> Are there specific needs "out there" that are being met by WE content?
> Do we know what they are? Do we know if there are specific needs that
> are not currently met by WE content, but could be if that content were
> available?
>
> Are WE doing enough for "visitors"? Can WE do better?
>
> Your thoughts?
>
> ..Valerie
> >
>


-- 
Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
Director,
International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to