In a message dated 11/12/2008 7:26:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
anyone who really cares about credit for the authorship of his text, should really pick some other medium than wikipedia. myself, I always thought that was the implication of not own, and our warning about what can happen to what you write. Its not as if it cost money to set up a blog.>> --------------------- A blog isn't an encyclopedia however. Your argument works, until you realize that Knol is doing this already. They are not a blog, but more like an encyclopedia, albeit just starting out. Perhaps someone could address the similarities and differences in the approach of WP as against Knol. We already have a form of attribution, in the history and the tools already pointed out. All I'm suggesting is that it could be made more apparent. **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & more!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212774565x1200812037/aol?redir=htt p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
