On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Steve Summit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Johnson wrote: > > In a message dated 11/12/2008 12:47:23 PM Pacific Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> In what way is the history tab unusable? Are you saying you would > >> prefer an alternate view which lists users in descending order by > >> number of edits to the page (rather than listing edits by user and > >> timestamp)? There's something on the toolserver which does just that.. > > > > That could fit the bill. If WP would make something like that an > official > > part of the system. Then we could see at a glance, that an article was > > 90% by myself or only 2% or whatever. > > I'm late to this thread, so pardon me if I'm repeating, but I'm > *glad* that it's not obvious who wrote an article. I like to > think of Wikipedia as being written by some large number of > anonymous contributors, one of whom happens to be me. Even asking > whether an article was written 90% by me or 2% or whatever -- > to me, that sounds perilously close to WP:OWN. Thanks. I think that proves my point. Wikipedia has been taken over by altruists. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
