On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Erik Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm sorry for being behind the curve on this, but could someone point
>> me to a discussion or policy explaining when & why the requirement to
>> be autoconfirmed in order to upload files was created? Doesn't this
>> just shift whatever problem it tries to solve to Commons, which
>> doesn't have that restriction?
>
> I don't know and can not find where it was decided to include upload
> in auto-confirmed, but I do remember complaining about it previously
> when the criteria for auto-confirmed status was extended.
>
> Search for 'upload':
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed_Proposal/Poll2
>
> At the time new users got a completely unhelpful permission denied
> response from the software, at least now you get a wall of text which
> somewhere has a link to commons.
>
> The benefit that some people tried to convince me of is that this
> policy effectively restricts the addition of images which are not
> freely licensed to established users.  I'm not convinced that this is
> especially beneficial, and I suspect the added complexity of uploading
> to commons probably costs us contributions enough to offset whatever
> benefit the current behaviour brings.
>
> I'd rather see a more nuanced quarantine and approval process to deal
> with the low quality of submissions by new users. .. or, at least make
> the upload button go straight to commons for users who can't use it
> locally to cut out the extra chances for confusion.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>

Making the upload button go straight to Commons would create a lot of
problems there, as nonfree content that would be legitimate on
Wikipedia would be routed there and subsequently deleted, creating
headaches for them and confusion for the uploader. I think an approval
process might work, though there's certainly nothing stopping anyone
from saying "There's an image at [link here] that I believe could
legitimately be used in [[article]], could you please have a look and
upload it if you agree?"

-- 
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to