2008/11/25 Oskar Sigvardsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There's really two arguments here, a legal argument and a moral one. > Legally, the talmudic list of general disclaimers (which no sane > person reads) probably covers us, but is that enough? Should we stop > there?
Yes because of the second half of the legal argument. If we start putting up individual disclaimers that means it can be argued that we know our general disclaimers are not up to the task. Result; the article we fail to put a specialist disclaimer on becomes a massive liability. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
