Has anyone stopped to ask whether this is really worth it to the SEO? In terms of labor and cost/benefit?
Suppose for discussion that this works. At most, it puts a very small part of an extremely well known website slightly lower in the rankings. I doubt it's a valid assumption that if some unknown site is number 3 in the rankings and WP dips down to number 4, large numbers of people who would otherwise have gone to the most popular reference site on the Internet will migrate to the unknown site. Brand value counts for something. When I'm browsing Google News and *The New York Times* appears fourth in the listings while a small town newspaper pops up at third, I'm still more likely to click on the *Times* article. Especially if I'm in a hurry. -Durova On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't read the article, but they are saying to do this *just* to > knock a > > page off the front page of Google hits ? > > I don't really understand the motivation. > > If WP is #1 or #2 and your spamvertisment is #4 you can increase your > income greatly by getting WP delisted even if you can do nothing to > improve the position of your site. > > There are far more effective techniques that these SEO scummbags have > not figured out yet. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- http://durova.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
