On Thursday 04 December 2008, Carcharoth wrote: > A popular approach? No offense, but isn't this just the way it should > have been done all along? It is certainly the way many journals and > books do it, and it is common sense.
By which standard? Short notes with bibliography is not that common from my experience and little covered in Chicago. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Lissitzky This is a good example of the form, though the non-hypertextual short note is certainly inconvenient. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_evolution This is a Frankenstein. A mixture of two styles: long notes and short notes + bibliography. I've never seen this in print and is poor practice. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
