2008/12/9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > In a message dated 12/8/2008 4:48:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If the album cover is the key feature of the picture (which it would > be, since that's the point of making the picture) then it could well > be enough.>> > > > -------------------- > I think it would be a hard case to win to try to suppose what the "intent" > of the picture taker was. > Substantially similar means that a typical person would say, "Oh that's the > same object" in a slightly different form. > > A picture of you, holding an album cover, is the same object as a picture of > the album cover. Not in my book. Me standing in front of the Taj Mahal is > not the Taj Mahal. > > It would be interesting however if someone were to stand in Times Square and > sue everyone who was taking pictures of each other. Since obviously their > *intent* is to violate the copyright of the giant billboards behind them....
Incidental inclusion. In this case just throwing any images at flickr would probably be the safest option. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
