2008/12/9 Oskar Sigvardsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> And I support that - blocking child porn on the internet is a good >> thing. What I'd like to see is a little more oversight in the system >> and them notifying blockees (they'll probably say they can't do that >> because the child porn people would then know to move their site, and >> there is a point there, but I don't see a workable alternative - >> they'll just have to work harder to find out where they've moved to). > > Well, everyone agrees that child porn is evil and should be combated > (well, not everyone, but those who don't are fucked up), but their > method is a spectacularly bad way of doing it. It's good that because > of the wikipedia block there's a debate about the IWF.
Oh, sure, there are massive technical problems with their way of blocking, but that's a separate issue to the one of censorship. Censoring an encyclopaedia article is wrong regardless of how you do it. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
