> It feels to me that the arguments being made by those opposed to this > content is that it's "out of scope for the article", and that putting > this information in somehow violates our guidelines about undue > weight, since nobody but a couple of academics cares about it and it's > irrelevant. > > I find both quite troubling. "Undue weight" doesn't mean "Remove all > academics from popular culture articles because fans don't care, and > fans outnumber academics 10,000:1". > > Attempts to define an article's scope as excluding academic content > are also problematic. > > -Matt
Actually that argument is quite similar to those who felt inquiry into the factual content of Sicko was outside the scope of the article. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
