In a message dated 12/12/2008 1:12:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
Which of the literary criticism academics, publications, etc. can be so assumed to be accurate is more opaque to the outsider and harder to demonstrate / validate, I think.>> --------------------------- "Accurate" is the wrong word for in-project discussions. As editors we can only say that a position has been presented, evidence has been marshalled, the standard approach or theory is, and so on. "Accurate" here seems to me to be just another name for "Truth". Even within Physics there are competing theories all supposedly evidence-based. We merely have to present the competing views and move on :) Will Johnson **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
