I've posted on this a few times, and have, as I work through it more,  
found the problem more and more glaring. As it stands, WP:NOR  
contradicts WP:NPOV.

Here's the problem - the clause that says that claims about primary  
sources that require specialist knowledge cannot be made without  
secondary sources.

Here's the problem - there is a very famous debate that went on over  
three essays between Jacques Derrida and John Searle. Searle's attack  
on Derrida - the second of these three essays - is clearly a  
significant point of view on Derrida, and NPOV requires reporting it.  
Furthermore, as it is a secondary source, it can be summarized with  
impunity, as there is no specialist knowledge rule on secondary sources.

Derrida's response is equally self-evidently a significant view, as  
Derrida responding to significant attacks is clearly something we need  
to report under NPOV. But Derrida's essay - which is long and  
technical - requires specialist knowledge to explain. Thus it cannot  
be summarized.

The real problem is that this is not an isolated case - any time there  
is a debate in an advanced, specialist topic, we are going to run into  
this problem - criticism can be summarized directly, while the  
subject's response to the criticism cannot. This is a flagrant  
violation of NPOV, stacking the deck in every single specialist topic  
on Wikipedia. This is positively disastrous for BLPs - poison pen  
critics can sandbag a subject left, right, and center, and if the  
matter is technical, the subject's responses often cannot be included  
in articles, or, if they can, can only be included inasmuch as they  
are discussed by others, while the critics are under no such  
restriction. Absurd, and clearly a violation of NPOV.

The prohibition on summaries of primary sources that require  
specialist knowledge absolutely has to be removed. It is, flat out, a  
violation of NPOV.

-Phil

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to