In a message dated 12/28/2008 5:18:40 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
This is generally speaking both a poor description of primary sources and of our internal definition of them.>> Okay and I say "Not !" Which is as useful a rejoinder isn't it :) The sole useful alternative view, would be that *both* report and counter-report are secondary sources. The simple fact that a person is speaking about their own work, doesn't make their words primary for that, it depends on the context in which they are speaking. I.E. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Will Johnson **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
