Its absence is not a violation provided we write biographies with tact as blp advises us to do.
On 12/29/08, Joe Szilagyi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:14 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2008/12/29 David Goodman <[email protected]>: >> >>> If we permit opt out, we will have a situation where we have, for all >>> medium-level people who are somewhat less than famous, favorable bios >>> only. There is no possible way to have both NPOV content and >>> subjects owning the articles on themselves. Whatever way we solve the >>> difficulties with BLP, it shouldn't be turning us into an publicity >>> platform. >> >> >> Correct. Opt-out will violate NPOV. >> >> >> - d. > > I think opt-out more than flagged, more than semi, more than anything > else would be fought to the death over by some extremists. But I don't > know if it would violate NPOV. Is an absence a violation? > > - Joe > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
