Right but nobody will know to check back on the article. Generally articles are monitored by watching the rc feeds, at least that is what I used to do.
On 12/31/08, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > In a message dated 12/30/2008 8:32:58 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Sorry, I am not getting it. Please explain in more detail.>> > > > -------------------- > First you must be familiar with the {{uc}}. > This tag tells a tagger/deleter... STOP I'm working here ! > > If, for each new article, we simply automatically tag it {{uc}} with > today's > date, then no new article should get tagged for deletion simply because > it's > new and under developed. > > IF a new article is merely spam, or vandalism of course, you can delete it > even with a uc tag. > > Some editors, like myself, do not develop articles all-at-once and plop > them > in, rather we develop them in-project with a bit and piece here and there > and given several hours, you have a full article, or at least a useful > stub. > So new article patrollers just see one sentence, and then five minutes > later > two more sentences, and then 15 minutes later another paragraph.... they > are > likely to want to tag it as too stubby right away. The uc tag stops that. > > But new editors won't know, first day, about this tag . So making it > automatic would solve that issue. > > Will Johnson > > > > **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, > Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
