Actually, the new version is out and allows us to start dual licensing. Discussing is taking place on EN here: [[Wikipedia talk:Transition to CC-BY-SA]]
A final vote will be on Meta to move all the projects. --Falcorian On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:11 AM, White Cat <[email protected]>wrote: > Legal reasons. GFDL isn't compatible with it. GFDLs new version is said to > be compatible but the release of that has been delayed many times so far. > - White Cat > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:09 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 1/8/2009 1:08:02 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > [email protected] writes: > > > > I think these are all subclasses of the problem "the GFDL is horriby > > vague and broken rubbish that even the FSF has given up on answering > > questions about" and we can't move to CC by-sa fast enough.>> > > > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > What is holding up the move? > > > > > > **************New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making > > headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000026) > > _______________________________________________ > > WikiEN-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
