On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > When challenged, a contributor, must not only *state* that person A > is a > previously published expert in this area, but *show* that that is > the case. > > The burden of proof that someone is a previously published (by a third > party) author/expert is on the contributor, not the deleter. > > So. Is there evidence on the table here?
For the expertise of Richard Bartle? I'm sorry. Let me try again. For the expertise of [[Richard Bartle]]? -Phil _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
