On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:56 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/1/12 <[email protected]>: > >> Well your "querulous and idiotic" is someone else's "attempt to ensure the >> source is reliable". > > > Well, not really. If they don't believe a given item can have reliable > sources - the sort of rabid nutters who brag about deletion tallies on > their user pages - then they just won't accept anything. I speak here > from observation of the phenomenon. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >
There is a tremendous difference between "won't accept just anything" and "won't accept anything". Pulling up a few blogs doesn't mean you're done, and can say "I've got it sourced, these horrible people just won't accept it!" -- Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
