And since there is no effective means of community wide discussion, and after that, there is no means to determine that consensus has been reached, with a community so ill defined, we have a problem with consensus.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, White Cat <[email protected]> wrote: > By "community consensus" I mean the result of "community wide discussion". > Community consensus does not mean a discrete discussions by an elite number > of editors in some hidden sub project page no one cares about. > - White Cat > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Martijn Hoekstra <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Marc Riddell >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> on 1/13/09 2:33 AM, White Cat at [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> >> In other words there is a lack of consensus. Meaning no mass action of >> any >> >> kind should be taken until a consensus is secured. >> >> >> > On any given subject within the Project, how does someone go about >> achieving >> > consensus? And how and when do you determine that a consensus has been >> > reached? >> > >> > Marc Riddell >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > WikiEN-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > >> >> I have been trying to write an essay on that for ages on that: see >> [[WP:TINCON]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
