I hav dynamic IP, myself, and it seems that typically, I get the same IP I had last time if it is available, and it is always within the same 64k block. What is more impractical is the manpower demanded by what we are doing now, which is blocking one IP# at a time.
"Al Tally" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:47 AM, brewhaha%40edmc.net > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Do we not yet hav a policy regarding open proxies (relays)? I would think >> that anonymizer.com and anything like it is blocked indefinitely. hotmail >> and gmail blocked anonymizer.com. Why should we not? As a jeneral rule, >> open >> relays for e-mail are listed and blocked, so as a jeneral rule, mail >> relays >> only serve congestion physics and paying users. >> > > Yes, we do have a rule. We also have a rule against vandalism. Hanson does > not care for rules. Anonymizer.com is just one proxy. There are thousands > of > proxies. He also edits through a normal ISP. We can't range block that; it > would be impractical. > > -- > Alex > (User:Majorly) > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
