George Herbert wrote: > Your comment ( "(a) Wikipedia pages relate to the mission, not > anyone's felt need for self-expression" ) goes, or seems to imply (and > is being read that way by several of us...) much further. I don't > think there's support or a consensus for much further. Wikipedia > isn't a blog, social networking site, or user homepage - but it is a > community, and a working environment (volunteer as it is), and as > David points out, people like to decorate their cubes (in whatever > form cubes take). This is normal human behavior and not something to > be arbitrarily squashed. Well then, please read in the on-topic fashion - if done in such a way as to "lower the tone", I recall, userpages are not really welcome to contain just anything. But the misreading of userspace=user page here is vexing. The problem comes, re blogging, when people really do "blog" on dedicated user pages, in violation of WP:USER, and apparently stand on their rights to do that.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
