Personally I don't think we have enough commentary on the actions of others.
Some people using their tools blithely go through the project leaving
wreckage in their paths believing that they will never be subject to scrutiny,
simply because those they tred upon, don't know enough or have the ability to
contruct a long involved analysis.
Having bits and pieces of past conflicts in the userspace helps injured
parties collect data about these rogues, so that a full commentary can be
contructed and also so that groups can be formed to co-ordinate a campaign.
I don't have a problem with allowing this sort of thing to exist. If a
person finds themselves often the target of this sort of approach then maybe
the
problem in with them, and not with those who take the time to create this
evidence in userspace.
Anything which helps identify abuse or suspected abuse in the project is to
our credit, not detriment.
Will Johnson
**************The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. AOL Music takes you there.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
