2009/2/11 Charlotte Webb <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Patton 123 <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know a de-admining process is proposed practically every other day, but >> this >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EVula/opining/RfA_overhaul>doesn't appear >> to have had much discussion. What do you think about it? Personally I think >> it's a good idea, the only draw back being new accounts abusing it. > > If the numbers really matter so much, the simplest and fairest > approach would be to a reconfirmation poll, where anyone can raise > concerns but "voting" is limited to those who participated previously > in the user's successful RFA. Sure there may still be sockpuppets or > meatpuppets, etc. for or against the user in the reconfirmation > shin-dig, but only if they were already present during the first RFA. > If we are only looking at the net change in approval rating within the > same audience, they would not likely have a pivotal impact.
That doesn't work for admins that have been around a while - most of the people that contributed to their RFA will have left the project. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
