2009/2/17 Sage Ross <[email protected]>: > That would be interesting. I wonder if this could be something that > could be integrated into the 1.0 rating scheme... another, parallel > rating for "scope" or "generality". Naturally, any such > determinations will be subjective, but so are article ratings and yet > the semi-codified Stub-Start-C-B ratings tend to work out pretty well. > It would be great to have the breakdown of general vs. specific > articles not just for FAs, but for everything.
That might be good. It would also help when determining if an article being an orphan is a problem. Very specific articles probably won't be linked to much, more general articles will be. So, if a general article is an orphan, we have a problem, if a specific article is, we probably don't. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
