On Feb 22, 2009, at 7:50 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I disagree. Our obligation should be to report what is reported. > Not to > obscure merely for the sake of some rather ill-defined notion of > "privacy" or > some such thing. > > Do you think we should not report the names of the children of Edward > III > who died as infants? > I think it's interesting to see what he and his wife named each of his > children. > In addition, if a biography subject had no children, one child, or 12 > children, is very important to presenting a full picture of the person. > > Children have a great impact on parents. If our sources discuss the > children, then we should as well. > If they don't, then we shouldn't either.
This worries me. As Charles Matthews said, it would terrible to make a rigid, general rule about this, but most mentions of subjects' children strike me as unnotable. That is, they clutter the bandwidth. Sources tell much, much more than is suitable for an encyclopedia. We are summarizing the highlights, not attempting to report every fact. Ben _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
