Two words: interlibrary loan.

-Durova

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Sam Blacketer
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On 3/4/09, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > (I've been *really annoyed* lately when a fact in an article has a
> > reference ... but it's been tagged {{fact}} because it doesn't have an
> > *online* reference. Suggestion: searching for all articles with
> > "</ref>{{fact" in them and sending 50,000 volts through the chair of
> > anyone who tagged a reference on mere paper.
>
>
> I've seen that in editing disputes - where one side insists that the other
> side's reference isn't actually verifiable because it's not online so they
> can't verify it. Feel like pointing out we did actually use to be able to
> check things out before the internet happened you know. However I suspect
> most of these are fairly tendentious, along the lines of people who tag
> articles as unreferenced because they don't have inline references but do
> have a list of books from which all the facts in the article were taken.
>
> --
> Sam Blacketer
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



-- 
http://durova.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to