Interesting. Just to be disruptive, I proposed OBT for Talk:Obama: People WP:DONTLIKEIT was the only concept I got from scanning the responses. The only point I remember; one user mentioned his watchlist; missing the point that he could just simply add particular topic talk subpages to his watchlist. I didn't mention there for various reasons.
-Sv On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jay Litwyn <[email protected]> wrote: > Organizing [[talk_prion]] was the first thing I did where no rules apply. > All I did was entitle threads and answer what I could. When you are > scanning > for changes, headings help you identify the end of a thread. Once you hav > entitled the threads, you can see which threads are actually members of the > same thread. I did not get to that. > _______ > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:[email protected] > > "stevertigo" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > Certain thready discussions on certain contentious talk pages would > > benefit from less disorganized (ie. standard format) talk pages, and > > more topical-based ones. I wrote up a basic concept at WP:TP (direct > > shortcut WP:OBT ): > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page#Organization_by_topic > > > > 仇恨郵件 > > 最值得歡迎的 > > > > -SV > > > > _______________________________________________ > > WikiEN-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
