2009/3/25  <[email protected]>:
> In a message dated 3/25/2009 1:34:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
>
>> I don't think the IWF will make that mistake again. I never thought
>> I'd see so many people being so outspokenly against a charity
>> dedicated to fighting child pornography!>>
>
> This is what you said, which misses the point.
> People weren't against them because they are dedicated to fighting child
> pornography, so this is a straw man position.
>
> People were against them because they operate censorship inside a black box.
>
> Quite a different situation.  And why people were so vehement in their
> condemnation.

Ah, this is simply a misunderstanding! What I meant was that one would
expect people to be thoroughly in support of a charity dedicated to
fighting child pornography so the fact that there was such outspoken
criticism shows how big a mistake blocking Wikipedia was.

I don't think people were against them due to the lack of
transparency, I think it was the fact that they blocked an
encyclopaedia that annoyed people. (The lack of transparency annoys
us, but I'm not sure the general public/media know much about those
details.)

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to