I know what you mean. I fail to see the relevance of all those baseball articles.
2009/4/9 Eugene van der Pijll <[email protected]>: > Bill Carter schreef: >> For everyone else, take my angry diatribes seriously and verify the >> accusations I am making. the article with 40 citations that was speedy >> deleted remains here: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_article > > The article is excellently referenced, but it just fails to make me > care. Why is this journalist more interesting than others? What makes > him notable? Give us a reason why he should have an article. I'm as > inclusionist as no other, but this article doesn't show me in any way > how Alan Cabal is different from his colleagues, who don't get an > article. > > (And don't post it to the list: edit the article to make it clear why it > should be returned to the encyclopedia.) > > Eugene > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
