On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ian Woollard <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 21/04/2009, Scientia Potentia est <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not too concerned. Their notability standards seem to be very loose, > and > > they have few of the trappings that we emphasize: BLP, neutrality, > reliable > > sourcing, brilliant prose, etc. > > That's exactly the kind of thing that the Encyclopedia Britannica said > about the Wikipedia! > > -- > -Ian Woollard > Exactly what I thought. Better integration and support for wikiprojects (have to say, I sort of prefer "task groups" as a name...), better recognition on the wiki of top contributors to various articles -- those are things we could really learn from. And if we could approach the proprietor, and encourage a more compatible licensing scheme, our Chinese language projects could really benefit (and their project could benefit from Wikimedia content). Did this thing just appear out of nowhere? Suddenly a collaborative online reference site larger than the English Wikipedia? Nathan _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
