So far as I can tell from percentage breakdowns by country in Alexa, the Chinese go to hudong and zh.wikipedia.org equally often- virtually the same number of page hits. However, hudong ranks 112 and wikipedia.org ranks 66 in China, which tells you that a lot of people are reading the other languages more than Chinese.
On 21/04/2009, geni <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/4/21 Scientia Potentia est <[email protected]>: >> I'm not too concerned. Their notability standards seem to be very loose, >> and they have >few of the trappings that we emphasize: BLP, neutrality, >> reliable sourcing, brilliant prose, >etc. The software is also much more >> focused on social networking. Furthermore, Hudong >is not free. >> > > Apart from the neutrality our readers and most of our writers tend not > to care about that. The integration with a degree of social networking > tools is also interesting They have a forum linked off their main page > among other things. > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > -- -Ian Woollard We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. Life in a perfectly imperfect world would be *much* better. Life in an imperfectly perfect world would be pretty ghastly though. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
