On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Ken Arromdee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 [email protected] wrote: >>If they are not willing to type two sentences on an official >>site, but ARE willing to type a hundred in-project, than I submit it's >>*highly* unlikely to be the person in question in the first place. >> >>IF they write a blog where they complain about process, that is simply >>more free publicity for us. There is no such thing as bad publicity. > > This is exactly what's wrong with BLP. We care more about the process than > we do about the people. > > If someone says that a relatively uncontroversial fact in an article about > themselves is wrong, we should fix it. If our process says we shouldn't > listen to them, then we need to fix both the process and the article. > > If you really doubt that the person themselves is sending you a correction, > then fine. But that's only good if you really have some reason to doubt it's > them. Saying "what if it isn't them" and then stretching it to cover all > situations whether you believe it's them or not is just elevating process > above people.
And when you get two people contacting you, both claiming to be the same person? Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
