In a message dated 4/23/2009 7:14:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

At the  time, the basis of identifying
him was putting known facts about the  pseudonymous author (date of
imprisonment, French Foreign Legion  membership), against an old
newspaper article containing similar details  about a named man who had
committed a crime. Since no independent  connection had been made
between the pseudonym and his legal name, it did  constitute original
research. It is only now that Erwin James has  identified himself in a
national newspaper that it no longer constitutes  original research.>>



--------------------------
 
Using sources to establish things of this sort, is not the creation of a  
source.
Original research involves the creation of a source, not already  present.
 
Connecting the dots, using sources, *can be* but is not necessarily  
original research.
>From the way you described this so far, I do not see how this could be  
considered original research.  He has already opened the door by  establishing 
facts about himself in a secondary source, and therefore, we can  use 
primary sources to back up or clarify those secondary mentions.
 
That is the nature of source-based research using primary sources.  If  we 
were to establish something like this as original research, that would  
essentially prevent the use of primary sources entirely.  We deliberately  
crafted the OR policy to allow the use of observation in primary sources.
 
There is no analysis being done here.  Merely placing two known facts  
side-by-side and stating that they are the same fact.  That is not  analysis.
 
We do not need a source to say the Sun is hot.  Everybody can observe  that 
for themselves.  Just as anyone can read an old newspaper themselves  
without the need for something to explain the connection to them.
 
Will
 
 
**************Big savings on Dell XPS Laptops and Desktops! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219799634x1201361008/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubl
eclick.net%2Fclk%3B214133440%3B36002254%3Bj)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to