Nothing is to do here. Adminships, last time I checked, are already subject to a time-out under admins open to recall. I do not think it matters whether it's three months, twelve, or fifty months. If that's the length of your term, then it does not matter if you go into a coma due to a bad batch of homebrew: You're still an admin. The subject is whether it is ever proper to hand over accounts. Maybe it's proper to hand an account over to your wife or secretary; probably common practice. I think there are some organizational accounts around; they're clearly identified as such. I saw one that had a specific scope in botanical medicine. _______ Warning: BEER.SYS not found. Operator not loaded.
"Angela Anuszewski" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > It does make you wonder... with the extra responsibility associated with > having an admin account, there should be some expectation of a certain > level > of activity. There are certainly guidelines for the amount of activity > that > should have occured before an RFA, so why aren't there any for an expected > level of activity once adminship is granted? > > A de-sysoping for failure to meet this level probably shouldn't be > automatic, but I wouldn't have any issue with there being an automatic > "call > for review" based on it... > Angela > > -- > Wikipedia:[[User:Psu256]] > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
