Thomas Dalton wrote: > Even if we aren't worried about the consequences of giving incorrect > advice (which we should be), that guideline is still a good one for > the reasons it gives - such information is not encyclopaedic. Someone > using Wikipedia for its intended purpose should have no need for the > dosage information. > I agree with the first part (serious consequences of incorrect information), but I don't see how why dosage information is unencyclopedic. Information on typical quantities used for any chemical compound with practical applications is a perfectly expected thing to include in an article. I certainly find it a conceptually interesting distinction whether some industrial acid is usually used in 10 mL or 100 L quantities, and similarly whether some drug is usually used in 10 mg or 100 g quantities; that's especially true if different quantities of a chemical have different applications.
-Mark _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
