On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Fred Bauder <[email protected]>wrote: > > No problem, we might as well take a stab at it. However, my experience > here is of deadlock, not resolution. Deadlock characterized by sterile > repetition of fixed positions. > Great. One of us should ask the techies to get it set up. [To Alex] Entire revolutions can occur the wiki without coming to a user's > attention. A mailing list devoted to dispute resolution would focus > attention, even if all it did was point to significant on wiki > discussions. The functionaries list and, presumably the arbitration list > already do this. A dispute resolution list would clue everyone in, not > just functionaries and arbitrators. > Indeed. Ostensibly, the list would deal with not just specific dispute resolutions, but with dispute resolution itself - how it works, etc. These concepts haven't changed much since late 2003, and as such there may need to be adjustments - people have ideas I'm sure. And of course, dealing with both specific cases and with general concepts in the same context makes it a bit of an integration issue. And that's another answer for Alex's question - integration based on a particular concept. If the concept was Electric Trains, then of course a separate mailing list wouldn't be justified. -Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
