On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Charles Matthews > > > I happen to disagree strongly with Stevertigo's comment that "the > customer is always" right in relation to dispute resolution. If that > were true, terms like "wikilawyer" and "vexatious litigant" would be > redundant in our context. And they are not.
The Arbcom's definition for "wikilawyering"? Can you show us an Arbcom case where "wikilawyering" was a finding? > Anyone who really advocates > for the opening of another front in dispute resolution had better take > into account the way our mechanisms become, for some of our "customers", > mere instruments or means to their ends. The point is not to be > "proactive" for the sake of activity, but to forward the mission. Just > wait until DR-en is subject to a barrage of "evidence" not admissible in > onsite terms, but said to be crucial to someone's view of matters. > Hm. Interesting points for the dres-en mailing list, Charles. -Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
