On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Good point, Emily. Ironically enough though, Arbcom itself doesn't > > participate much in openly discussing its cases. Strange isn't it? > > Not really, doing the work is hard enough. Additional communication is on > top of that. If decisions are made privately, it would have to be copied > over again to make them public. The only alternative is to engage in open > discussion on the wiki. They can talk about why they don't do that. > Well it was Erik who finally convinced me of the superiority of open-sourced over closed-source technology. Open-source software allows for a greater degree of freedom of movement, which itself has a synergistic relationship with greater social freedom concepts in general. So I agree with your implied meaning, that in a very short amount of time, we can make it so that no one has to buy or else deal with Microsoft's products at all. -Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
