On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Andrew
Turvey<[email protected]> wrote:
> Does that mean we should have the same process for "delisting" admins - not 
> really fair that candidates today are held to a higher standard than 
> candidates who got through three years ago!

Actually it is "fair", in a warped way. RfA is supposed to be purely a
risk management exercise: we subject prospective admins to a couple of
tests to reduce our risk that they go feral. The chance of a 3 year
old admin going feral is much much lower than the average prospective
admin, sort of by definition.

(So I don't see a benefit of desysopping/retesting, just on that basis.)

Steve

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to