2009/7/20 Carcharoth <[email protected]>: > It would be interesting to compare why low-resolution is considered OK > here, to support and encourage the revenue stream of a professional > photographer, but not in the case of the National Portrait Gallery > (where the underlying works are public domain), and the revenue stream > is (in theory) supporting the digitisation costs. >
Because the photographers copyright claim is legit. Under US law the National Portrait Gallery's isn't. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
