Actually there are circumstances when admins can and should edit fully protected articles per: WP:FULL.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FULL>
Does anyone really object to the idea of admins responding to a request for admin help by editing a fully protected page in accordance with talkpage consensus? WereSpielChequers > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:47:18 -0400 > From: wjhon...@aol.com > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] How wikipedia could link into File Protection. > To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Message-ID: <8cbd991b3a1ad8c-1414-5...@webmail-mh03.sysops.aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > When full protection is used, then it should stay until it is changed to > semi-protection. > We should not have a type of protection that allows admins to make > *content* changes willy-nilly. > When an article is in full protection, admins should not be making content > changes, except perhaps to revert changes that were the problematic ones in > the first place. > > > > <<Jay's original email refers to using this when there has been an edit > war - in other words when full protection *is* used currently.>> _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
