Luna wrote: > If someone intends to maintain control over how content is used -- which I > think is what Elipongo was getting at -- that content is not freely > licensed.
Well, if the control someone intends to control over their content is ironclad, I don't think they'd agree to have it engraved verbatim on a public monument. > Where the clear intent of a photo is to reproduce a given text verbatim, > I should think that the original copyright on that text (if any) still > applies. I suppose the way the photo is cropped clouds the argument somewhat. But I think (I hope) we can agree that a freely-licensed photo of the monument as a monument -- that happened to visibly include the text -- would not be objectionable. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
