2009/7/29 Ken Arromdee <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, geni wrote: >> > It's too bad that the people saying that publishing the inkblots is harmful >> > are professionals instead of New York Times editors. If it was the New >> > York Times, they would have been unceremoniously deleted without even a >> > WP:OFFICE. >> Not really. In this case there are a number editors who've spent >> significant amounts of time arguing for their inclusion and are not >> likely to react to well to any attempted removal. > > If the New York Times had claimed the information is harmful, Jimbo would have > deleted the information much earlier--no editor would have gotten a *chance* > to spend a significant amount of time defending it. You don't get editors > investing a lot of time if you make the deletion a fait accompli before a lot > of time has passed.
Jimbo isn't a commons admin. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
