Our preoccupation with the modern era triumphs again. Though we have a picture that includes him http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prince_Rupert_-_1st_English_Civil_War.jpg, and mentions in a couple of articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Rupert_of_the_Rhine [[Familiar spirit#Prince Rupert's dog<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Familiar_spirit#Prince_Rupert.27s_dog>]]. We don't have a proper article on Boye. WereSpielChequers
> ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:28:12 +0100 > From: Carcharoth <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too > deletionist > To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville > Heiskanen<[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually > > do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides > > as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally > > considered pets. > > Deletionists, look away now... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals > > Carcharoth > > PS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucephalus > > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:30:59 +0100 > From: Carcharoth <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too > deletionist > To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi-Ville > > Heiskanen<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > >> More seriously - relatively speaking - I think we actually > >> do have quite a few emperors and the like favorite rides > >> as articles of their own. Granted horse are not generally > >> considered pets. > > > > Deletionists, look away now... > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals > > <sob> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_births_by_year > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_deaths_by_year > > That is ridiculous category use. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_amputees > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_lobsters > > And going full-circle: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_Presidential_pets > > Carcharoth > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:34:34 +0100 > From: Carcharoth <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] If anyone ever says Wikipedia is too > deletionist > To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Carcharoth<[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Carcharoth<[email protected]> > wrote: > > <snip> > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Famous_animals > > This one, on the other hand, is interesting (takes all sorts): > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Animal_monuments > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Cod_of_Massachusetts > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend_of_Perm_Bear > > Nice to know that Laika is on this one: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monument_to_the_Conquerors_of_Space > > Carcharoth > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
