2009/7/31 Charles Matthews <[email protected]>: > Ben Kovitz wrote: >> "The site's other major flaw is its incompleteness. Wikipedia was able >> to answer only 40 per cent of the drug questions Clauson asked of it. >> By contrast, the traditionally edited Medscape Drug Reference answered >> 82 per cent of questions. 'If there is missing safety information >> about a drug, that can be really detrimental,' Clauson points out." >> >> > The good news is that the template {{missing}} exists. The bad news is > that it appears hardly to be used (backlinks for [[Template:Missing]]). > Could we do more to make clear to the public that there is such a > template to add? They have caught on quite well to {{fact}}. > > Charles
The bad news is a considerable amount of the stuff they considered to be missing (dosage information and the like) we probably wouldn't consider encyclopedic. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
